I've seen your video, and my beliefs are still the same. I was not impressed by the two commentators, they looked like drunkards, especially the arrogant fat one (I really could'nt stand him). However, one thing they were right about though, is if you have faith you are untouchable. That's exactly the case for me.
For the verses of the old testament of the Bible, it's not astonishing that some of them are obscure, because they were translated from many ancient languages from the Middle East.
First of all, creation. The man commenting makes a very stupid and grotesque claims, that there are two accounts of the creation of man- . It's obvious to me that the Bible gives a general description of how everything was created in the first chapter of Genesis, then in the second chapter it goes more into detail about Adam and Eve.
Chapter 1 http://www.biblegateway.c om/passage/?book_...er=1& version=31
Chapter 2
http://www.biblegateway.c om/passage/?book_...er=2& version=31
Then the presentator claims that it would have been impossible for Noah to put billions of species in the Arch. Well, he's probably right. The fact is, Noah didn't take a billion creatures on the Arch, according to the Bible he took a male and female of every species. Your commentator has it wrong
Verse here http://www.biblegateway.c om/passage/?book_...er=6& version=31
Then he claims the marsupials could not have gone to Australia. Well the Lord created the Sun, Earth planets etc so I can't see how he could not lead a marsupio to Australia...
Then comes the question of the Flooding and Noah's Arch. I don't why the fat guy's talking about the Euphrates, that has nothing to do with the Bible. The whole world is being flooded. See verse here: http://www.biblegateway.c om/passage/?book_...er=7& version=31
Then that arrogant fat guy says there is no proof that the Israelites were enslaved by the Egyptians. He is seriously misinformed, and has nothing to back up that statement. Any source will tell you the contrary.
"No evidence of Moses outside the Bible"
That is false, the jews and moslems have accounts of him and what he did. As for archeological evidence, there is archeologiacal evidence that chariots crossed the Red Sea when it opened.
Then the guy says that there were many other "Messaiahs" I'll have to thank him for illustrating one the Bible's points: that there'll be false prophets and false christs. See the Bible quotes about False prophets, false messaiahs here
http://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/False_prophet...e_New _Testament
The Appolonius dude the commentator mentions corresponds exactly to the definition of a false prophet, and BTW see this quote, also found in the wikipedia link
"For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect –- if that were possible. See, I have told you ahead of time" (Matthew 24:10-13;24 NIV).
And anyway the sources of the story of Appolonius who was born after Jesus's death are suspicious, see wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w iki/Apollonius_of_Tyana
As for the other ancient laws, like this one you mention "the bible talks about "stoning people to death" if they work on sundays..." they have been disbanded, for a simple reason. One could follow these rules, and still be a hypocrite. One can easily not work on sundays and still live in a sinful way. It's like the episode of the adulterous woman. Jews asked Jesus if they should stone an woman for adultery, Jesus replies Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone.
So I may conclude that the commentators don't know half of what they are talking about. They do not understand, nor have read the Bible properly.
They have deceived you. What you have to do now is seek for the Truth.

Noah did not take so much animals in that arch, probably less than a thousand, and this quote proves it.
http://www.biblegateway.c om/passage/?book_...er=7& version=31
The remainder of your post is your subjective opinion.

You're welcome dude
I hope I don't sound too stern my lenghty response to that video. But those people haven't read enough /don't comprehend the Bible. They don't know half of what they're talking about.